MISS DIXIE’S STOCKHOLM SYNDROME
Walter D. (Donnie) Kennedy
Many people will remember the case of millionaire heiress
Patty Hearse who was kidnapped by the Symbionese Liberation Army
back in 1974. After a somewhat extended time as a hostage it
was reported that Miss Hearse had “gone native,” that is, she
began to identify with her captors and their radical
philosophy. This act of a hostage becoming one with their
captors has been described by many experts as the “Stockholm
Syndrome.” The existence of this syndrome and whether Miss
Hearst was a victim of it is something that is debated to this
day. Nevertheless, when it comes to “political” Stockholm
syndrome, Dixie, that is, the South, is without a doubt a
victim.
Since the days of
Barry Goldwater, well over forty years ago, the South has been
promised that if they would abandon their loyalty to the
Democratic Party, all would be well. After all, we were told
that the Republican Party had become the party of small
government and State’s Rights—why should Dixie continue to
support the Democrats who were now the party of big government?
From the election of 1964 until this day, the so-called party of
small government, the Republican Party, has held the South
hostage. As time goes on it becomes more and more obvious that
the core values of the South are not being defended, let alone
promoted, by the Republican Party. Yet it is the Christian
conservative voters of Dixie who have given the G.O.P. its White
House victories and made it the majority party.
Why one would embrace the values
of their captors and why Dixie still votes for a party that does
nothing to defend its core values is something that befuddles
experts. In a recent Pew poll it was demonstrated that Southern
voters hold stronger ties with Christianity than voters in the
North.1
It has also been demonstrated that Southern voters are more
likely than their Northern counterparts to hold strong pro-life
views; Southern voters are more likely to oppose illegal
immigration than voters in the North; Southern voters are more
likely to view the Bible and Christianity as positive forces in
America than Northern voters and this list can continue on with
such issues as gun control, reverse discrimination, local
control of public schools and the display of the Confederate
flag.2
Recently two issues demonstrate this disconnect between the
National Republican Party and the mindset of the average
Southern voter: Illegal immigration and homosexuality.
From the
smoke-filled back rooms of the Federal Congress Building,
Republicans and Democrats hammered out an illegal immigration
bill that is nothing less than rewarding law-breakers by giving
them amnesty. By a large margin Americans do not desire the
passage of such a bill. By an even larger margin Southerners
oppose this bill. Nevertheless if the Federal Congress gets its
way, what Americans desire and what they get will not even be
close to the same. For the South with its traditional State’s
Rights view, this bill is a double slap in the face.
Thomas Jefferson
and James Madison, the virtual founders of the State’s Rights
party in these United States, warned what would happen once the
Federal government became the sole judge of its actions and
power. In the Kentucky and Virginia Resolves of ’98 Jefferson
and Madison stated that it was a function of “we the people” of
the sovereign States to force the Federal government to live by
the limitations of the Constitution and the will of the people.
Now that REAL State’s Rights are dead, the Federal government
can and does act as its own judge, contrary to the will of the
people. The South stands and watches as the Republicans and
Democrats dictate a policy that Southerners understand would not
stand up to a vote of the people. Likewise, they watch as the
so-called defender of State’s Rights (since Barry Goldwater)
forces this act down the throat of the people without any fear
of REAL State’s Rights getting in their way.
Like the
immigration issue, the issue of morality, that is, traditional
Christian-based morality, demonstrates how the hostage of the
Republican Party, the South, is disconnected from the world-view
of the National Republican Party. Recently a photograph of Vice
President Dick Cheney, his wife and new grandchild was displayed
on the White House web page. The baby is the child of Cheney’s
lesbian daughter. His daughter and her lesbian partner are
raising Cheney’s grandchild. This is the same Dick Cheney that
refused to go to a friend’s funeral in South Carolina because
his deceased friend requested a Confederate flag be placed on
his coffin. Here is proof positive that the National Republican
Party would rather be seen promoting the homosexual lifestyle
than be seen near a Confederate flag. Now remember in every
poll and vote taken in the South, the Confederate flag carries
the day by a large margin, while homosexuality is viewed as an
immoral and abhorrent lifestyle. Does anyone see something akin
to the Stockholm syndrome in Dixie? The Republican Party does
not come close to the mindset of the average Southern
conservative voter and yet, with each election, the South
embraces its G.O.P. captors.
How fortunate for
the Republicans that no one, so far, has been able to perform a
“hostage intervention” and awaken the voters of Dixie to their
plight. As the G.O.P. presidential ticket continues to drift
toward the center, that is, the left, spokesmen for the
Republican Party are already proclaiming the mantra that
“Southerners are better off voting Republican than allowing a
Clinton or Obama to be elected.” Really! So if Dixie once
again votes Republican can she be assured that her Christian
world view will be respected; will the public display of the Ten
commandments be protected; will Southern States have the right
to protect the lives of unborn children; will the right to keep
and bear arms be protected; will the sacredness of one man and
one woman marriage be protected; will the children of Dixie be
protected from the homosexual agenda; and will REAL State’s
Rights once again be our bulwark against Federal tyranny?
The Republican
Party has held the voters of the South hostage for the past
forty years with the threat that if they don’t vote Republican
an even worse party, the Democratic Party, will surely trample
upon their values. Yet after forty years it is becoming more
and more obvious that the Republicans are nothing less than the
rear-guard of Democratic victories. Republicans never mount a
counter-attack against the socialistic schemes of the Democrats
and often join the Democrats in defending previous socialist
victories.3
The same Republican Party that has been a forty year failure for
the South is the same Republican Party whose President, George
Bush, stood by and allowed Federal agents to remove the Ten
Commandments from the Supreme Court Building in Alabama; also,
as the Republican Governor of Texas, Bush stood by and even
encouraged the removal of a plaque honoring Confederate Veterans
of Texas from governmental buildings in Texas. Why should Dixie
remain loyal to her hostage takers? A better question to ask is
“When will a reasonable alternative to Republican failure be
offered to Dixie?”
1
James R. Kennedy, What is Dixie Doing in Rosie
O’Donnell’s America? www.kennedytwins.com
2
William L. Cawthon, Jr., The Free Magnolia, ‘The
South as its Own Nation, Vol. I, No.2, April-June, 2007.
3
James R. Kennedy, Reclaiming Liberty (Pelican
Publishing Co., Gretna, La.: 2005) 29-39.
|